M P Follet On Integration

-


Mary Parker Follett, a pioneer of modern management theory, introduced “integration” as her most important method for resolving conflict in organizations and social groups. She regarded as a bridge between classical approach and behavioral  human relation of organization. Unlike other contemporary thinkers she viewed organization as a social system and administration as a social process. 

M P Follet criticized classical theorist for focused on mechanical approach and ignore socio-psychological dimension of organization. 


M P Follet on Conflict 

M P Follet believed that conflict is not problem but a part of organization.  We can't ignore conflict and can't imagine an organization without conflict. It is inevitable due to individual differences. 

According to Follett it is not a warfare and harmful but a basic problem. It should be resolved in constructive way.  She believed that conflict is natural and can be used creatively if handled properly. Thus she propunded the concept of Constructive Conflict.  




Three Ways to Handle Conflict


Follett suggested three ways to resolve Conflict in any organization: 


(a) Domination


One side wins, the other loses


Leads to resentment


Not a sustainable solution



(b) Compromise


Both sides give up something


Temporary, incomplete satisfaction


"Half–win, half–lose" outcome



(c) Integration


Both sides work together


Create a new and creative solution


Everyone's interests are fulfilled



According to Follett  Integration is the highest and most effective form of conflict resolution because :

It resolve problem from its roots

It makes use of better technique and saves both Time and resources. 


How Integration Works


Follett suggested various steps of Integration: 


Each sides understand the real interests, not positions and focus on their actual need.

Both sides search for common goals


Use creative thinking to generate new options


Focus on the whole situation, not individual demands



Integration requires Co-operation, Open communications, Respected and Shared problem-solving



 Importance of Integration


Builds stronger relationships


Encourages teamwork


Reduces workplace tension


Improves productivity


Leads to innovative solutions



Follett’s integration method is widely used today in:


Management


Organizational behaviour


Conflict resolution


Negotiation


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

POLITICAL THEORY: MEANING, NATURE AND SIGNIFICANCE

-
Image
  Political Theory helps us to better understand the concepts which shaped our political system. Before knowing Political Theory, we should have idea about what is Theory.   THEORY Merriam Wbester Dictionary defines a Theory as “an idea or set of ideas that is intended to explain facts or events that is suggested or presented as possibly true but that is not known or proven to be true”. It is a rational enterprise which draws conclusion based on reasons. Theories are contextual because they change with time, places and persons. Theory can’t be objective totally because it is human nature to become subjective in many terms. It is always based on assumption but these assumptions are followed by reasons.   POLITICAL THEORY The term Political Theory sometime interchangeable with other terms like ‘political thought’, ‘political philosophy’, political ideology etc. But it is different from these terms. Political Theory is a body of systematic knowledge related...
Read more

Alienation theory of Karl Marx

-
Image
Karl Marx ’s concept of alienation came from his early writings. He described this concept as how workers become disconnected from their work, their products, and their own human essence under capitalism .   Marx gave this concept in economic and philosophic manuscript of 1844 . He presented the humanistic view of his work in this writing.  In his early writings he did not analyzed Capitalism as class struggle and antagonism.  He emphasized on the evil effects of Capitalism on Social life. Capitalism leads society into alienation which further result into loss of identity and freedom. According to Marx freedom is not what Capitalist says but freedom from necessity. It means that when all basic needs are fulfilled of men, only then he is free. Real freedom is only possible in communism . In Capitalist society it turned into isolation and disconnected the organic bond between men and society. So this Capitalist society is responsible for alienation of working class ....
Read more

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AMBEDKAR AND GANDHI ON CASTE

-
Image
  Mahatma Gandhi and B R Ambedkar were two great socio-political reformers of their times. They were intellectual elite of their respective times. Being from an upper caste, Gandhi left every privilege that life afforded and got down to even do jobs like cleaning dirt to symbolize that he was the same as the members on untouchable community. On the other hand, Dr Ambedkar chose to acquire academic brilliance and even a sense of fashion, to symbolize that he, by birth an untouchable was no different than the members on the so-called higher castes. Both had opposite approaches to the same mean. Before study their ideological differences, we should take a glance on similarities of both.   SIMILARITIES ·         Both Dr Ambedkar and Mahatma Gandhi agreed that caste-based discrimination and the custom of untouchability in India was unjust. It should be abolished. ·         Both created organizations to ...
Read more